Player Rankings - 2013 Small Forwards

* Rankings data shown based on latest ESPN Rankings as of 2013-03-03, Scout Rankings as of 2013-03-03, and Rivals Rankings as of 2012-12-27

Rk +/- Player Pos Ht Wt Scout +/- Rivals +/- ESPN +/- Tot School
1 0 Andrew Wiggins SF 6-8 205 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 Kansas
2 0 Jabari Parker SF 6-8 220 2 -1 2 -1 2 -1 6 Duke
3 0 James Young SF 6-6 210 3 -1 2 0 3 -1 8 Kentucky
4 1 Wayne Selden SF 6-5 230 6 -2 7 0 4 -2 17 Kansas
5 3 Brannen Greene SF 6-7 215 10 -2 5 -1 9 2 24 Kansas
6 3 Semi Ojeleye SF 6-6 220 7 0 8 -1 9 0 24 Duke
7 0 Nick King SF 6-7 215 8 -2 10 -1 8 -1 26 Memphis
8 -2 Kuran Iverson SF 6-8 200 13 -3 6 -1 7 -1 26 Memphis
9 2 Zak Irvin SF 6-6 190 12 2 9 0 6 -2 27 Michigan
10 0 Troy Williams SF 6-7 190 16 -6 9 -1 10 -2 35 Indiana
11 3 Brandon Austin SF 6-6 180 9 0 14 -1 12 0 35 Providence
12 1 Deonte Burton SF 6-5 230 13 -1 13 -1 11 -1 37 Marquette
13 -1 Ishmail Wainright SF 6-6 235 14 -3 12 -1 13 -8 39 Baylor
14 1 V.J. Beachem SF 6-6 180 17 -4 15 -1 15 -1 47 Notre Dame
15 2 Dakarai Allen SF 6-6 175 11 4 21 -1 17 5 49 San Diego State
16 0 Josh Hart SF 6-5 190 15 3 18 -1 18 1 51 Villanova
17 34 Rondae Hollis-Jefferson SF 6-7 215 4 -1 4 - 5 46 59 Arizona
18 9 B.J. Johnson SF 6-7 180 20 9 27 - 21 2 68 Syracuse
19 -2 Greg McClinton SF 6-6 185 23 -2 23 -1 24 -8 70 Wake Forest
20 1 Vince Hunter SF 6-8 210 24 0 19 -1 30 -4 73 UTEP
21 1 Nick Fuller SF 6-7 195 25 2 27 - 22 -4 74 Nebraska
22 -5 Quinton Stephens SF 6-8 205 24 -2 27 - 25 -8 76 Georgia Tech
23 20 DeAndre Bembry SF 6-6 165 31 - 27 - 19 25 77 Saint Joseph's
24 -1 Anthony January SF 6-8 210 31 - 16 16 32 0 79 Undecided
25 -3 Calvin Hermanson SF 6-6 215 27 -3 26 -1 28 -4 81 Saint Mary's
26 -8 Tony Farmer SF 6-7 220 31 -11 27 - 27 -5 85 Undecided
27 1 Basil Smotherman SF 6-6 190 26 5 27 - 32 -7 85 Purdue
28 9 Wesley Iwundu SF 6-7 190 31 - 27 - 27 13 85 Kansas State
29 21 D.J. Fenner SF 6-5 200 31 - 27 - 29 22 87 Nevada
30 -12 Roschon Prince SF 6-6 200 31 - 17 -1 43 -23 91 USC
31 -7 Byron 'Bo' Zeigler SF 6-6 185 31 - 27 - 33 -12 91 South Florida
32 6 Deshawn Freeman SF 6-6 210 31 - 27 - 35 5 93 Undecided
33 17 Brandan Stith SF 6-7 210 31 - 27 - 36 15 94 East Carolina
34 10 Devin Davis SF 6-6 200 31 - 22 -1 42 8 95 Indiana
35 11 Seth Berger SF 6-7 210 31 - 27 - 37 9 95 Massachusetts
36 -4 Jordan Swopshire SF 6-6 190 31 - 27 - 38 -5 96 Bradley
37 3 Nate Taphorn SF 6-7 205 31 - 27 - 39 3 97 Northwestern
38 4 Peter Jok SF 6-6 210 31 - 27 - 40 3 98 Iowa
39 29 Tre'Shaun Fletcher SF 6-6 195 21 2 27 - 16 35 99 Colorado
40 -7 Kendall Pollard SF 6-5 200 31 - 27 - 41 -7 99 Dayton
41 9 Jeffrey 'Jeff' Carroll SF 6-6 200 31 - 27 - 44 7 102 Oklahoma State
42 -2 Riley Dearring SF 6-5 175 31 - 27 - 45 -3 103 Wisconsin
43 -14 Noah Allen SF 6-6 210 31 - 27 - 45 -16 103 UCLA
44 -15 Leyton Hammonds SF 6-9 200 31 - 27 - 46 -16 104 Oklahoma State
45 -15 Devante Fitzgerald SF 6-7 200 31 - 27 - 47 -16 105 Texas A&M
46 2 Paul Watson SF 6-6 190 31 - 24 -1 51 - 106 Fresno State
47 3 Collin Hartman SF 6-6 200 31 - 27 - 49 2 107 Indiana
48 -17 Anthony Dallier SF 6-6 190 31 - 27 - 50 -18 108 Yale
49 1 Alvin Ellis SF 6-5 185 30 1 27 - 51 - 108 Michigan State
  • © 2013 Foglift - All Rights Reserved
  • Legal Notices
  • Trademarks - Verbal Commits, verbalcommits.com, and the Verbal Commits Logos are trademarks and property of Foglift. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners. Any and all usage of university trademarks, wordmarks and logos are purely for identification purposes. Verbal Commits is not affiliated with any university in any way, further all content on Verbal Commits is for news purposes only.
  • Rosters - All roster information including but not limited to scholarship numbers, walk-on status, redshirt status, offers, interest levels, and commits are unofficial. Please visit the official website for each school to see the official roster.
  • Data - All data sourced from third party sources, including but not limited to individual player rankings and individual player star evaluations are used under the doctrine of fair use, and all such evaluative data remain the exclusive property of the original source.